Part 4 of the Physics of Society

Why are we most likely as a society a wave packet instead of a line?

When you look at the ‘society particle’ traveling through the medium of a contextual vacuum (community + environment + linear progression of time = reality), there are some concepts that apply to our lives and interconnection of social organization that show effect at the particle and individual level. A further consideration of change, time and morality can show the practical function of our society and the things that erode linear travel through the vacuum only to cause the oscillation between progression and regressive oppression in our social advancement.

When we think of change most people don’t like it, they don’t like change that disrupts their routine of normality. Sure, some people are constantly changing, when you think about it we are all changing through the experiences of our lives. There remains that hesitance on real change, change that sets new direction or transforms our sense of normal. This is not because we can’t understand change, its because we cannot understand the practicality and process of change and that makes predicting its impact on our individual routines hard, and us hesitant. This can be seen most commonly on high publicized issues or vast subjects outside the comprehension of those who don’t educate themselves on the subject but are instead made aware in a piecemeal way. The interconnection of society is supposed to transfer information but it is often interrupted through the prism of individual prospects and ideological beliefs.

But there’s a deeper question in this, who is most resistant to change? And is it their resistance that causes the negative repercussion of collective issue impression? To this, the answer is yes: there are those that restrict, manipulate and conform information to their interest of maintaining power and resisting change and it flows through society like a poison. This is the negative charge that I mentioned in my previous post about the society particle (https://medium.com/@jamesrhule/the-physics-of-society-598d527d3120?source=linkShare-46758848ca00-1486875488) those who are most resistant to change are in any situation, those that stand to lose what they have come accustom to. The idea is not new but it is most commonly applied at the micro-scale, the public and their individual demographics relative to the whole. The ‘society particle’ is made turbulent at the higher levels of society, these people are most resistant to systemic change. Change that would even out the oscillation and progress society collectively. This is looking at the individuals of the society particle as wavenumber of the wave packet instead of the binding of society as a whole particle. The parallel to physics is a wave length that straightens through a low-density medium, it is akin to a truly equitable and circular society that progresses through technological and contextual barriers of life. When the top tier fails to redistribute wealth and opportunity, the community component of the medium increases density, the environment wanes from overuse and waste while the linear progression sees repetition of context — highs and lows of the particle wave length that align through the contextual struggle of freedom and a greater share of social assets reoccurring, generation after generation. I would joke about the association of density and the knowledge transfer and understanding of the general community, but it’s not funny, its sad.

Furthermore, this failure to understand the transfer of resources in the community that are derived from the environment causes wave packets of societies in the linear progression of time, instead of a straight line or a wave this failure to recognize the equal value of every individual in society causes an accumulation of resources and a collapse that results in the envelope or ‘wave packet’ of a ‘society particle’ traveling through time. If you’re unfamiliar with what a wave packet is, it’s like all the components of the ‘society particle’ put together as a unit of collective movement, the individual members of society are like the constituent particle waves of the wave packet. In relating this concept of differential perspective as a common theme we can transcend the notion of change in individuals to a deeper level.

With this in mind, it calls to question the basics of morality. if like in my previous post, the conservation of action causes the push for greater freedom of repressed populations and that resource hoarding causes the wavelength to oscillate, what defence is there for this resistance to change and mindful oppression? For this I will dig deeper into physics, on the subatomic level particles seem to pop in and out of existence, this flux is like the different perspectives of human life in the common community element of reality. (or we could stick with waves and see it with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle in regards to particle positioning of individuals in society) This means that we can see ‘cosmic justice’ as the karma like force I alluded to in my previous post, but more consequential: you live the life you harm the most. The energy configuration that we each are like a quantum particle that dissipates and conserves with time and our bodies acting as a mere illusion of linear cognition and observation. This denotes a quantum entanglement of the energy field of the mind and a local configuration of reality in which the ‘society particle’ moves through. Think of everyone as a spectrum outcomes of a simulated wave length; a particle wavelength diffraction experiment is infinite random possibilities but observation creates expectation of configuration or positioning which in the ‘society particle’ is the context of a body and individual beings in a society.

So then does it make sense to monopolize the randomness of life? No, because you would only be disadvantaging and harming yourself, it would be extremely short sighted and ignorant to hoard the resources that you are essentially depriving yourself. And ironically, that’s what happens in society by the top tier in their retention of control and “freedom” in the current human civilization or ‘society particle’ configuration. The lesson is played out on linear scale of our history with the rise and fall of civilizations, but the idea doesn’t seem to stick. Even more practically, they are themselves limited in their hoarding of resources of the exponential possibility of a straighter society particle wavelength, that’s getting fucked over twice if you ask me, but we already know those with vast wealth are in most cases made mentally ill by it so should we blame them? Or just take all their resources and put them in treatment?

Regardless, in the ‘society particle’, change is really a balance of time and the moral obligation to see ourselves in others, it is to see deeper than the context our individuality and make choices that empower us all to live better lives, so we can share the increased value it creates. Hoarding our common entitlements and selling it, is only selling ourselves to ourselves and that’s not progressive, its an oscillation. It is an up and down that sees our freedom as individuals become that which we increase and decrease instead of equalize and elevate. it is our difference that allows us to make things we think others would need. Society can be propelled forward or held back, but it is our failure to merge the understanding of who we are and what we can all be, that holds us to the same behaviour that sees history repeat itself thematically and makes ‘the society particle’ a wave packet.

The real question now is, is failing to change “evil” or bad? Are those who resist change for their own gain both crazy and corrupt? What value is there in individualism over real collectivism?

A counter note, or contradicting note could be made that a wave packet has a peak that resembles the exponential increase in technology + the standard of living and that the decline is inevitable. however, one should remember that it is the wave number that encapsulates the collective population and is therefore dispersing the externalities of linear progression (with regards to tech and life quality/standards not time) and that the most understanding thing to do in light of the associated morality entanglement in the society particle is to adamantly strive for social progress; so that the structure and dimensions of the wave number is as congruent as possible to ensure the anthropological longevity of our ‘society particle’ and equity of our society in contemporary (In which time is only an illusion).

consciousness history news philosophy physics politics science spirituality