Part 2 of the Physics of Society

In order to fully complete the ideas presented in my previous post about the application and unification of physics in society, I have selected four elements that need to be explained further: Medium, Conservation of Action, Entanglement of Context and State of Equilibrium. Each when applied to society and understood with the concepts on Newtonian Physics and Quantum Physics can help us understand the flaws of human society and the narrow path that we must strive to achieve to have the longest possible existence as a species.

Medium

When we think of “medium”, we have to superimpose ourselves in a state in and out of that of nature. We are made of nature but unlike nature, we are separated by observation. We can look at ourselves while nature remains blind, innate, and perfectly harmonic. We as a living creatures, are the opposite: we are chaotic, visual and driven to consume to sustain ourselves. We eat to resist becoming nature again, this act is the only true distinction of life and nature. Sight is another, but it is secondary as there are blind creatures and consumption requires no senses. However, we aren’t as distinct as much as we like to think we are. We are still made up on the same building blocks of our perceived reality and that is the most significant part of existence, either in a group or alone. Just like we as individuals are made up of the constructs and ideas of our society, we as beings are made up of the constructs and materials of our reality. It is important to understand that physics applies just as much to us, as it does on a single photon or proton. There is nothing that separates us from the constraints of physics that would make us immune to its systemic manifestations of normality. (the cosmological imperative) What removes us, is the sustained collective force of our configuration (our bodies) resisting entropy. Much like a star, we are emitting fields of electromagnetic energy to hold our bodies together and collected in a single being. (Alternaely the idea of being like blackholes with our constant need for consumption to survive, be stimulated by both surroundings and information. With our endless interpretation and choices from intelligence, acting like the singularity of infinity, merely bound in a singular perspective.) Our minds are simply an organic organ projecting the fields of energy we experience as reality. Our minds are not a new plane of reality, but simply a layer of complexity and constructed entanglement of the tiered scale of energy configuration we reside within. Our actions are therefore like wavelengths acting on the medium — reality, because we are energy just like a photon. Instead of being constantly moving waves of energy, we create ripples of action that intercede and transmit through the various mediums of our shared reality. With reality affixed to the perception of linear time being the medium; our collective perception of things like community, spatial area and experience within society are the inputs of wave (ripple) transmission and therefore govern the normality of our juxtaposed reality — our Newtonian laws of society if you will. This idea culminates in the next subject that I will address, the conservation of action.

Conservation of Action

When I say “conservation of action” most will automatically assume some sort of contrived idea of karma, one can assume such a force exists to return the intention of our actions back to us, but it is more substantial than that. The conservation of action designs the fate or linear progression of our civilization through the perspective of fixed time. If we assume that civilization as a whole, is the wave length; and that we, the independent actors, are the vibrations of the larger particle progressing through the medium — the natural environment. To visualize our individual beings, we are the factions of an atom or better yet a nuclear element made to move as a wave, decaying as it progresses. We can look at our inner attraction and repulsions as a group for the pursuit mutual survival and defined by our individual and collective identity in the framework of the larger unit to form our cohesion. Just like fermions, quarks and bosons make up atoms, we make up the configuration of the society, the scale is relative to the charges or effect of singular or habitual actions by individuals that in themselves are like the atoms; the interconnection forms the same idea. The idea is: we are fractions of a larger whole and in our interconnection, we affect the trajectory and the structural cohesiveness of the larger whole. Another idea to think about when visualizing this concept is a crystallized lattice configuration with each bond a structure of the larger solid, made stable with the interconnecting vertices to hold the structure in a defined dense sturdy shape. Even DNA offers us the same idea of structure: two interconnected rails of peaks and valleys with a connective ladder holding them together and coiled to incredible lengths and vast stores of data (the coding of amino acids are just individual actors working to together to create a whole).

These examples are supposed to invoke the sense of interconnection of action, on a scale larger than the action itself. What remains is a structure, the actions of an individual actor connected to another, which in turn will shape their experience and influence their own choices while holding the community whole through the common need for progression and resistance to entropy. This idea potentially removes the idea of freewill and replaces it with a perpetuated illusion of choice, within the confines of the system. Each action will deliver a response either equal to that of the action, stored for later action or result in the manifestation of actions culminated i.e. ‘innate action’ or the stored potential of choices and decisions made beforehand. This concept can be seen through our human history in the figures that defined a revolution or shift in social direction, and calls into question: are the pivotal figures of humanity rightly revolutionary or merely the culmination of stored action? This could be seen as a equilibrium of the charge, binding the society particle together. Actions that create individual or class control in society is a negative charge while freedom or social right development, a positive charge. This makes social equity act as a neutral charge, which holds the particle whole. It leaves us to think further; Does systemic oppression breed those who challenge the system of oppression because they’ve experienced the stored wrongs of the social systems configuration trying to find balance in the ‘charges’ of its components? Are their pivotal choices made because the system had reached a point in where change was inevitable, we like to talk about the boiling point in which these actors became real change makers — is this the conservation of action acting on an individual? I think so. This can be made simpler; do we eat specific foods because they have been made receptive to our idea of nourishment or because we have systemically formed them to associated to a particular sense, craving, day-time or meal? Or the fact that every academic profession or area of human inquiry is the observation of trend and corresponding variables to shape the subject in question. We should therefore assume that society itself, is a conservation of actions created by the variables that define it. Our overlapping lives, sense of identity formed through social connections and common need, create the lattice structure or atom that progresses the wave that is civilization. These factors create inner action: attractive and repellent forces that in their manifestation, progress, restrict and define the context of actions of individuals and create systemic normalcy this defines a conservation of actions to replace the idea of thermodynamics within a society.

Recent experiments show that particles at the quantum level seem to decide path and position randomly, as if at a small enough scale the universe has choice and this can be like the individual actor in society- seemingly random with meaningless choices on the larger scale yet fundamental to the construction of society as a whole through potential contribution and created difference in ‘social particle’ state. This idea of randomness is reminiscent of our perceived notion of free will and like particles our actions can be entangled with each other, both in impact and experience.

Entanglement of Context and State of Equilibrium

When we understand that we are equal, truly equal, the idea of a conservation of action makes sense to be the hallmark force of repelling the constraints and causes of social inequality. Just like the conservation of actions will require a balance of oscillation in progression over the linear, the entanglement of context is the immediate experienced correlation of circumstance and position relative to the larger structure of society. This is the inverse vibration of the ‘society particle’, it can be as simple as finishing each other sentences or exterme as the empty hand and the full hand, poverty and extreme wealth. The system that holds society requires balance, therefore the ‘society particle’ in its interconnection is balanced through the negative and positive attraction of the individuals that it contains; much like actual particles in a molecule or charged ions in a particle. Some will say that the polar contrast of social experience has complex reasons like contextual history, position in relative society or result of hard work to move up socially. But you are then looking at it from the value chain perspective, when we interpret this as the fluctuation of the same particle through a medium, these extremes are entangled just as much as the observed quantum phenomena. (assuming locality is the illusion of single point perception and the static configuration of energy in a defined system or not, the concept remains) With this in mind, when you ask yourself: does one hand deserve to empty? You reach the fault of the perception of individualism, why without the grounding of morality or physics (if you need that rational an argument to see it) that there is no real progress without loss, there’s no growth without regression and ultimately: we create this need for lash back by our varying positions within the ‘society particle’. Resisting the laws or normality that describes nature, only creates the negative and positive oscillation of society: the empty and full hand of social actors. So any society worth living in, must strive to be a state of equilibrium: through the true transformation, because any false acts, half measures to retain control over others will only culminate in an oscillation, an inverse of action that ripples through the linear progression of the ‘society particle’ and the entanglement of individual experiences. How do we do this? We remove the greed of individualism through acts of unencumbered redistribution, we remove selfish resource (variable) control, we create a mentality of value that aligns with a deeper sense of community, not materialism….

We create a society that values life more than control and experience as the wave elongates and moves through the medium faster.

consciousness history news philosophy physics politics science spirituality