If you’ve followed along till this point you’ve seen how the comparison of human interaction in society can divulge into a comparative analysis of quantum mechanics and general relativity, this is because in order to discuss humanity, we must look at the system in which it functions totally and that typical social constraints aren’t big enough markers as they copy patterns ingrained in the structure of the universe to form things like forms, ideas, symbols and everyday lived experience.

In an n-dimensional universe, it is important to understand that even with infinite configurations, there is a total amount of configurations possible. regardless if this is another class of infinity, we are in our limited capacity, measuring this “n” to a limit, when the limit both doesn’t and does exist. now does this mean we retreat and call this infinity insolvable? no, it means we develop a protocol of understanding that includes both ending and beginning of this series in order to capture the magnitude of possibility. humanity and the trajectory of technology offer this, abate a theoretical path to comprehension as our progress and existence creates a knot akin to blackholes in space-time to the general fabric of reality. When we look at the emergence of quantum computing, artificial intelligence, and self-replicating automatons we can begin to see a canon in which a universe can be conceived, birthed and developed to the point in which we now we perceive it to be. The Kardashev scale outlines the progression of civilizations based on energy consumption as a measure of progress but it doesn’t explain the uses of energy as these civilizations scale, one such use would be to isolate areas of the “general vacuum” or the n-dimensional hyper-sphere of the universe by matching the latent energy produced by the vacuum its self-creating strings of possibility in regards to the transformation and “value” of energy within the multiverse bubble equaling to the energy paradigms outside of this smaller closed system to create a inner and outer relativity in circumstance — limiting n over fixed computations. (intelligence would have to progress to a point in which stars are harvested for energy and propel further harvest by self replicating robots until all stars, energy sources are tapped to a confined experiment or use within the given universe) this created universe within a universe would have a limit to “n” or the transformation of energy within its boundaries. creating bubble universes aren’t outside the realm of possibility because special relativity allows natural phenomena like black-holes to distort the fabric of the universe with their gravitational force, the energy converted to a limiting force like that experienced at the event horizon and within as time creates a tangible boundary to any created universe.(fixed n=e when e=v to the power of t ( v= variables like time or mass while t = # of transformations meaning in our universe e=mc2 resulting in a fixed n value of energy transformations) it’s important to note that time is added dimension (and to a lesser extent space) which limit’s transformation in this bubble universe allowing variables to compound and produce patterns, symbols or even themes in the first place. To achieve this, the important energy focus here is not the vacuum itself, it is the edge or event horizon which energy is focused and bound.

Like I mentioned the formation of symbols, norms and the general laws of physics become an aggregation of events possible in a “fixed n-dimension”, not breaking or surpassing this limits indicates a limit in dimensions. we see exceptions to this at the quantum level in which atoms interact and transmit information faster than light should allow but this reinforces the model in which time-space manipulation should work effectively to create both beginning and end to our perceived universe. Einstein developed a thought experiment to show the spooky action at a distance in which two identical atoms with opposite spins are released in opposite directions to show how the state of either atom could not be determined until one was measured, but there’s has to be an outcome for both atoms. This parallels to life easily, we are born and die but the trajectory is varied and cannot be known till it is experienced or measured, you could die minutes from being born or grow up to be the oldest of your kind, it is unknown from inception but must correspond to measurable outcomes, with variables that are often determined by a set of conditions and circumstances of the environment that establish the determination of life itself. much like spin being an effect of the universe and perceivable phenomena, life experience is an effect of society and development through the condition of time. much like the totality of the pure n-dimension this means the universe and your life is both determined and perceptibly random at the same time, dismantling the thermodynamic relativity between action and event as expounded upon in previous articles show the limits and patterns which emerge in life and are unavoidable unless under special conditions, conditions which you may never experience because the decisions have already been made in/are made by ignorance of the ramifications they may have. this is the cryptographic feature of history balanced against future possibilities of a ‘totalistic n-dimensional ledger’ for a zero-sum outcome that in it’s intricacy expounds on n-dimensions of possibility. you can’t rewrite history but that doesn’t mean other histories don’t or haven’t existed outside of your limited cognitive perception. the attachment to a single vantage hinders us from collectively leveraging the most streamlined and efficient path of social and technological development. but there is long-term hope in the technologies I’ve listed earlier as they offer a replication of the universal configuration in a controllable environment, a simulation that provides a zero-sum game to any possibility.

agriculture ai artificial-intelligence books business capitalism christianity climate climate-change consciousness culture economics economy environment faith farming finance food god health history intimacy life love mental-health mindfulness money news philosophy physics politics quantum-physics race racism relationships science sex sexuality society spirituality sustainability sustainable-agriculture technology war writing